Ethical Considerations

Capacity Assessment

•    Decision-specific: must relate to the particular decision at hand 

                                                                (e.g., consenting to surgery ≠ consenting to a flu vaccine)

•    Time-specific: capacity can fluctuate (e.g., delirium, metabolic disturbance)

•    Criteria (Mental Capacity Act 2005, UK):

1.    Understand relevant information

2.    Retain that information long enough to make a decision

3.    Weigh information to arrive at a choice

4.    Communicate decision (verbal, sign language, gestures)

•    Presumption of capacity unless proven otherwise

•    Supported decision-making encouraged whenever possible


Best Interests

•    Applies when a patient lacks capacity

•    Must consider:

o    Patient’s past and present wishes

o    Beliefs and values (e.g., religious or cultural)

o    Views of family and close friends (not decision-makers, but inform judgement)

o    Potential for regaining capacity

•    Multidisciplinary input (e.g., MDT meetings) often important

•    Avoid assumptions based solely on age, appearance, or condition


Advance Directives (Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment, ADRT)

•    Legally binding if:

o    Valid: patient had capacity when made, not withdrawn, not overridden by a later decision

o    Applicable: specific to current circumstances

•    Can refuse life-sustaining treatment if explicitly stated and signed/witnessed

•    Cannot demand specific treatments (only refuse)


DNACPR (Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation)

•    Covers CPR only

o    Does not preclude other active treatments (e.g., antibiotics, fluids, oxygen)

•    Ideally discussed with the patient and/or family

•    Must document discussion clearly

•    Can be a clinical decision but should involve patient wherever feasible

•    In emergencies, if no form is present presume CPR is appropriate


Restraint and Deprivation of Liberty

Restraint

•    Only justified if:

o    Necessary to prevent harm

o    Proportionate to risk and severity

•    Examples: bed rails, sedation, physical holds

Deprivation of Liberty

•    Applies when patient:

o    Lacks capacity

o    Is under continuous supervision and control

o    Is not free to leave

•    Requires legal safeguards under Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)

o    Independent assessments

o    Authorisation from local authority or court


Extra Revision Pearls

•    Doctrine of double effect: giving medications (e.g., opioids) to relieve suffering even if it may shorten life is ethically permissible if intention is symptom relief, not death

•    Gillick competence: minors (<16) can consent if judged competent to understand fully

•    Parental refusal: parents cannot demand treatment against child's best interests

•    Duty of candour: obligation to be open when things go wrong apologise, explain, remedy where possible




————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Author & Educational Disclaimer


Author:

Dr Phillip Cockrell BM FRCP DipClinEd


Dr Phillip Cockrell is a UK Consultant Physician in Internal Medicine, currently working at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust. He has previously worked as a registrar across Intensive Care Medicine, Gastroenterology, Cardiology, Stroke Medicine, Acute Medicine, and Respiratory Medicine.


He has held senior leadership roles including Associate Clinical Director of the Acute Medical Unit, Clinical Director of Internal Medicine, and Chief of Medicine. Dr Cockrell has over 15 years’ experience in postgraduate medical education, having lectured extensively across the MRCP syllabus and contributed to MRCP revision teaching and course development.


Dr Cockrell holds a Bachelor of Medicine (BM), Fellowship of the Royal College of Physicians (FRCP), and a Diploma in Clinical Education (DipClinEd). His teaching approach is based on structured consolidation of complex medical topics to support efficient and effective revision for postgraduate examinations.


Purpose of this content:

The material on this page is intended solely for educational purposes to support revision for the MRCP (UK) Part 1 examination. It reflects examination-relevant principles of internal medicine and is designed to aid learning and pattern recognition.


Medical disclaimer:

This content is designed for postgraduate medical examination revision and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment guidance and must not be used as a substitute for professional clinical judgement, local guidelines, or specialist consultation. Clinical decisions should always be made in the context of individual patient circumstances and current national guidance.