Capacity Assessment
• Decision-specific: must relate to the particular decision at hand
(e.g., consenting to surgery ≠ consenting to a flu vaccine)
• Time-specific: capacity can fluctuate (e.g., delirium, metabolic disturbance)
• Criteria (Mental Capacity Act 2005, UK):
1. Understand relevant information
2. Retain that information long enough to make a decision
3. Weigh information to arrive at a choice
4. Communicate decision (verbal, sign language, gestures)
• Presumption of capacity unless proven otherwise
• Supported decision-making encouraged whenever possible
Best Interests
• Applies when a patient lacks capacity
• Must consider:
o Patient’s past and present wishes
o Beliefs and values (e.g., religious or cultural)
o Views of family and close friends (not decision-makers, but inform judgement)
o Potential for regaining capacity
• Multidisciplinary input (e.g., MDT meetings) often important
• Avoid assumptions based solely on age, appearance, or condition
Advance Directives (Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment, ADRT)
• Legally binding if:
o Valid: patient had capacity when made, not withdrawn, not overridden by a later decision
o Applicable: specific to current circumstances
• Can refuse life-sustaining treatment if explicitly stated and signed/witnessed
• Cannot demand specific treatments (only refuse)
DNACPR (Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation)
• Covers CPR only
o Does not preclude other active treatments (e.g., antibiotics, fluids, oxygen)
• Ideally discussed with the patient and/or family
• Must document discussion clearly
• Can be a clinical decision but should involve patient wherever feasible
• In emergencies, if no form is present → presume CPR is appropriate
Restraint and Deprivation of Liberty
Restraint
• Only justified if:
o Necessary to prevent harm
o Proportionate to risk and severity
• Examples: bed rails, sedation, physical holds
Deprivation of Liberty
• Applies when patient:
o Lacks capacity
o Is under continuous supervision and control
o Is not free to leave
• Requires legal safeguards under Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
o Independent assessments
o Authorisation from local authority or court
Extra Revision Pearls
• Doctrine of double effect: giving medications (e.g., opioids) to relieve suffering even if it may shorten life is ethically permissible if intention is symptom relief, not death
• Gillick competence: minors (<16) can consent if judged competent to understand fully
• Parental refusal: parents cannot demand treatment against child's best interests
• Duty of candour: obligation to be open when things go wrong → apologise, explain, remedy where possible